I’m almost done with my Journalism 420 class, which is News Editing. If there’s one thing I’m leaving this class with, it’s with a new perspective on how I read the news. And it’s not a new perspective I wished I got.
I was just reading a breaking news story in the Chicago Tribune about police using a taser on a troublesome fan at The Player’s Championship on Friday, and I wasn’t reading it for the news. I wanted to. I wanted to know what happened, but my focus was on questioning the truths of the facts. If saying that the man was “charged with disorderly intoxication and resisting arrest without violence” was the right way to word things. Was that wording even correct? How can you “resist without violence”? What actions constitute something to be violent? Oh! Now I’m thinking like a lawyer, in a way, and I blame my Journalism 4110 Law and Communications class for the new perspective. Thanks!
I don’t know if I’m happy with thinking like an editor every single time I read a news story. I’m looking at the mistakes and asking myself “what’s wrong” with everything I read in the news. That’s not a good mentality to have whenever you read the news. In my Creative Writings 104 Intro to Narrative Writing, we workshop short stories from other students in our class. One of my professor’s rules is to not go into the story thinking “what’s wrong with this.” That’s a really important rule to have because it helps you focus and appreciate others’ creativity and works. I realized that I think my works are always better than others’. I’m so prideful. So self-centered. My ego is out of control, and I’m always competitive. If someone else’s works are better than mine, I hate it. I appreciate news editors who take note of my strengths and try to help me out in my weaknesses.
But having to think like an editor is torture. It’s hard to appreciate or even get the main ideas out of a story when you take a class or train how to edit. It’s beneficial, but captive at the same time.